A friend of mine, *
sick-snowangel posted this fantastic news article today about how female models are objectified in the majority of erotica art on dA. It's a great article that exposes a problem rarely talked about in this community. I really recommend that you read it here:
[link]
--
"Terror is as much a part of the concept of truth as runniness is of the concept of jam. We wouldn't like jam if it didn't, by its very nature, ooze. We wouldn't like truth if it wasn't sticky, if, from time to time, it didn't ooze blood." -Baudrillard
better late than never, eh? heheh
+watch
--
"Terror is as much a part of the concept of truth as runniness is of the concept of jam. We wouldn't like jam if it didn't, by its very nature, ooze. We wouldn't like truth if it wasn't sticky, if, from time to time, it didn't ooze blood." -Baudrillard
--
Mythos Imperfect.*
--
steps towards vosus sohm...
stomach hand - [link]
[link]
hahahaha
I got into a guys fav's like that on flickr cause he had a thing for redheads! It was creepy.
It's so funny, you're the only girl there who's more then partiallly dressed. It pisses me off at the same time though, cause all those photographs (besides yours) get massive amounts of favourites because the models are half-naked and somewhat attractive, not because of any photographic skill was involved in taking them.
oh i know. i really don't like most nude photos anyway, it's like people think showing nipple is going to make it 'artistic'... but most of the time it comes off crude and they're not really trying to make it beautiful like what nude art should be. </rant> unless it's confronting with a 'message' which it usually doesn't have.
basically: nude art is rarely good. heh
Most of it is "erotica" anyway...which I'm not too bigger fan of. It's nothing to do with the nudity, I just find it really masogynistic.
Previous Page12345...Next Page